DAVAR information and "bug"...
Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 4:16 pm
Dear Mr. Joseph,
I would like to give you my compliments for the programming of the Davar 4 - it's quite good, in my opinion.
However, I'm writing to you to request some additional information about some modules you have available.
The first is the [HINT] Hebrew Interlinear Bible with Strongs.
The second is the [IGNT] Interlinear Greek New Testament.
Can you please tell me:
1) How accurate are these texts in the Strong's correspondence?
2) Which original texts were used in their elaboration?
The IGNT seems to derive from (in the Davar notes):
- Interlinear Greek New Testament prepared from 1894 Scrivener Textus Receptus: Prepared by Larry Pierce & Maurice A. Robinson, Ph.D. Copyright (c) 1997, Winterbourne, Ont.
But is it the text exactly similar - with no changes - to Textus Receptus?
- The hebrew text, however, only refers that is the Hebrew OT, but does not specifies which version (Leningrad Codex?)
Another note, if I may, is that BHS unaccented with Strongs, for instance, only shows the Strog's numbers (not the text) in Nehemias 7:68 for instance - there are gaps.
I'm very sorry to disturb you.
Kind regards,
Kepler
I would like to give you my compliments for the programming of the Davar 4 - it's quite good, in my opinion.
However, I'm writing to you to request some additional information about some modules you have available.
The first is the [HINT] Hebrew Interlinear Bible with Strongs.
The second is the [IGNT] Interlinear Greek New Testament.
Can you please tell me:
1) How accurate are these texts in the Strong's correspondence?
2) Which original texts were used in their elaboration?
The IGNT seems to derive from (in the Davar notes):
- Interlinear Greek New Testament prepared from 1894 Scrivener Textus Receptus: Prepared by Larry Pierce & Maurice A. Robinson, Ph.D. Copyright (c) 1997, Winterbourne, Ont.
But is it the text exactly similar - with no changes - to Textus Receptus?
- The hebrew text, however, only refers that is the Hebrew OT, but does not specifies which version (Leningrad Codex?)
Another note, if I may, is that BHS unaccented with Strongs, for instance, only shows the Strog's numbers (not the text) in Nehemias 7:68 for instance - there are gaps.
I'm very sorry to disturb you.
Kind regards,
Kepler